Show Comments on:

Mason

June 02, 2012 5:02 PM

MOTOGP » Stoner snatches Catalunya MotoGP pole


for some reason my memory doesn't recall laguna last year. do remember few years ago tho when rossi and stoner were knocking each other around and stoner didn't like it. what i'd like to know is so many people liked rossi, now he's not doing well he gets alot of flac. and gone are the days of stoner the moaner. hardly see any of that now. wish they could all race on exactly the same bike, just one race, then we can see who is the best

Mason

May 27, 2012 8:12 PM

BSB » Snetterton 300 - Race results (1)


I don't like all the riders, be easier to say who i do like, walker, shakey, easton, tinmouth the rest i don't not like but i wouldnt go out of my way at a meeting to meet them. it is a public forum but the story was about race result not about a certain rider. why not go on the story about hill to moan about him. all this story shows is he won by over a second so to be honest not really the place to moan when they won by a margin

Mason

May 27, 2012 2:30 PM
Last Edited 388 days ago

BSB » Snetterton 300 - Race results (1)


@ bhp Dunno about you but when I've been at races and seen a rider they always spoke, I remember at brands in 2008 seeley went past on a moped, saw me looking at him and said hi as he went past, same with walker, even got a how are you off brooks on his way to the loo lol

Mason

May 26, 2012 4:06 PM

BSB » Snetterton 300 - Free practice times (1)


Bin Laden (weird saying it) actually did qualify at oulton, he was 3 secs quicker than the required time of 1 m 45. his free practice 2 time was inside the qualifying time which meant he was fast enough to qualify. he was also in the time required at thruxton, HOWEVER his 3 free practice times were slower than the requirement for qualifying so my argument is should he of been allowed to even start superpole if he wasn't fast enough to qualify in the 3 free practices


Page 11 of 18
« ‹ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  › »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.