Crash.Net User: OnTheOtherHand

Comments rating: 152
Position in rating: 753

Show Comments on:


June 09, 2013 12:13 PM

F1 » ‘Confident’ Brawn gave green light for test

Richard. I think a ban on FP1 would be quite substantial handicap. To demote them to the back of the grid every race would only negate their competition. The rest of the season would surely then be solely devoted to developments for next year car. So therefore an enforced sacrifice this year would increase their advantage for next year. I agree about the registration of users, I even had a post edited yesterday and not deleted. Mind you I only used another word for rear end. It's Good To Talk.


June 09, 2013 9:52 AM

F1 » ‘Confident’ Brawn gave green light for test

Richard. Could brain wash the Merecedes pilots. 107ss2009. The obvious solution is to abandon changes to this years tyres. Change the specification of next years tyres. Last issue is components tested and development gains on the car which may have been gained. If proven there is some, which is to be proven, then this issue had to be addressed. A simple solution/sanction would be to remove Mercedes from FP1 for the remainder of the season.


June 08, 2013 3:14 PM

F1 » Red Bull rejected Pirelli test approach

Richard. Is an approach not a form of contact. All these people will say whatever will benefit them the most, that is the nature of high competition. Typical F1. If there is an infringement of the rules/regulations, it should be dealt with in a TIMELY manner, not in the "Half ****d" way it is now. Are you looking forward to the race, maybe the alleged benefits for Mercedes will come clear. or maybe, clearly there was none. It's good to talk.

Page 14 of 30
« 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.