Crash.Net User: BrianC

Comments rating: 287
Position in rating: 617

Show Comments on:


July 30, 2012 5:13 PM

MotoGP » Valentino Rossi: 'Hard to concentrate' for poor positions

FYI Electronics on the bikes determine who's going to be at the front or not (just ask Tech 3 or the Honda SAT bikes). If DORNA doesn't want MotoGP to die, they need to stop letting the manufacturers mess with the electronics. Make them ALL use the same electronics package and let the BEST rider win. Right now, Hayden and Stoner are the only two on the grid who can ride WITHOUT electronics and win. The rest of the field would end up eating gravel.


July 30, 2012 12:46 PM
Last Edited 1374 days ago

MotoGP » Hayden flies Ducati flag, overtakes Rossi overall

"He has finally overtaken Rossi in the points. Half way through the season, and how long has he been riding the Jukati? I will help you. 6 friggin years." Are you blind? He joined Ducati in 2009, that means Hayden is in his 4th year with Ducati, not 6. 800s don't count as they were made for midgets like Pedrobot. As for Ducati being a "Japanese" bike, when in Rome, do as the Romans do. If they want to compete with the best bikes on the grid, they're going to have to emulate the success of Yamaha and Honda. This is a racing competition not a "styling" or "looks" race. Looks on the street sells bikes, performance and wins are what matters in racing.


July 28, 2012 12:16 AM

MotoGP » Ducati confirms new Nicky Hayden MotoGP contract

"Nicky, should of fought for the gressini spot with honda works." Obviously you don't understand how GP works. The factory "golden boy" gets the best electronics and parts. The rest get "tuned down", especially the sat bikes so that they do not beat the "golden boy". Don't believe me? Notice how much faster Pedrobot is than Stoner is right now? The factory said "Oh if Stoner is leaving, give him just enough to finish 3rd-6th and give the best to Pedrobot" THAT is why you will never see anyone on a Satellite bike win a GP race like you used to back in the 990s era when electronics weren't as sophisticated. THAT is why Rossi won't take a Sat bike. THAT is why Crutchlow wants a Factory ride (better results but maybe not 1st place electronics). And THAT is why Lorenzo will always beat Spies. The FACTORY decides who is going to be fastest, NOT the riders...


July 27, 2012 10:18 PM

MotoGP » Ducati confirms new Nicky Hayden MotoGP contract

@Realist We're going to have to agree to disagree. Rossi does have clout. So did Stoner since he brought Ducati a title in 2007 -- until he left. Are you saying Stoner had no say either?! Nicky gives Ducati feedback, as do most of their riders. They either listen or they don't. Ducati has a "holier than thou" attitude about their bikes and brand name. It doesn't always equate to a good bike (honestly, I would never ever buy a twin engined bike that doesn't say RC51 on the side). As for Roger, he has shown flashes of brilliance, so has Tommy. All of the Haydens are flat out quick and talented, but since Spies and Mladin left AMA only Josh Hayes has impressed me enough to say "This guy could win in WSBK or GP" -- he's that good.


July 27, 2012 7:57 PM

MotoGP » Ducati confirms new Nicky Hayden MotoGP contract

"Good points on page 3 as well, especially when you consider how consistent Pedrosa has been for nearly a decade. Hayden's 2006 win was the product of a lunar alignment, some witch hazel and...the God's were drunk." Wrong, not when you count the fact that in 2006 Hayden was TESTING parts for Pedrosa (Spanish rider, Spanish sponsorship), bad clutch (remember that?!), being speared by your own teammate (remember that?!). Nicky had finished up 2005 with 4 straight podiums. Lunar Alignment, Witch Hazel, god's drunk?! Come on man you can't possibly be that myopic. Nicky's hard work and perseverance paid dividends when even your own team was bowing down to Puig and his supposive "golden child" Pedrobot. Sheesh!

Page 6 of 10
« 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.