Crash.Net User: benignlyindifferent

Comments rating: 3460
Position in rating: 21

Show Comments on:


May 12, 2014 10:16 AM

F1 » Alonso insists Ferrari position was priority

Yes, the rumours of Alonso's dissatisfaction are likely well founded but where could he go? McLaren? Not particularly strong right now and seem to be chugging along like Ferrari, though there is a Honda on the way. Williams? Stronger this year but unlikely to be able to mount a consistent yearly challenge or develop the car through the season. Red Bull? Only if Seb leaves, which is a possibility. Mercedes? Likely to be the strongest team for the next few years but only if Nico leaves. Which could happen if he finds himself losing a few more battles to Hamilton. I would like to see Lewis-Fernando Part Two.


May 11, 2014 10:41 PM

F1 » Alonso insists Ferrari position was priority

benignlyindifferent: Much ado about nothing. The switch to a three stop strategy was impulsive and understandable, though he immediately came out in traffic and lost some time. Kimi had two laps to change strategy and remain ahead but the two stop looked promising. It worked out slightly better for Alonso but really, both men's talents are being wasted for the moment in a car that is very ordinary.
Great drivers can drive even an ordinary car. Vettel went from 15th to 4th in a car that he hardly drove all weekend.
True, and I commented positively on Seb's talent in the thread that focused on his drive. This thread does not concern Seb, it concerns the two Ferrari drivers. I restricted my comment to the topic. Both men have won this race twice and I suspect will likely win again. I am not sure why you interjected Vettel into the conversation but I suspect both Kimi and Fernando would switch cars with Seb in a moment while Vette

Page 11 of 78
« 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.