Crash.Net User: physics

Comments rating: 230
Position in rating: 501

Show Comments on:

physics

August 25, 2014 10:38 AM

F1 » Hamilton: Rosberg admits he hit me deliberately


20.3 More than one change of direction to defend a position is not permitted. Any driver moving back towards the racing line, having earlier defended his position off-line, should leave at least one car width between his own car and the edge of the track on the approach to the corner. 20.4 Any driver defending his position on a straight, and before any braking area, may use the full width of the track during his first move, provided no significant portion of the car attempting to pass is alongside his. Whilst defending in this way the driver may not leave the track without justifiable reason. For the avoidance of doubt, if any part of the front wing of the car attempting to pass is alongside the rear wheel of the car in front this will be deemed to be a 'significant portion'. 20.5 Manoeuvres liable to hinder other drivers, such as deliberate crowding of a car beyond the edge of the track or any other abnormal change of direction, are not permitted. Thats from f1 sportsmanship rules

physics

August 26, 2014 1:41 PM

F1 » Rosberg disputes Hamilton claims


JedPB67:
richard: in this case, lulu tried to drive nico off the track, and nico was right not to be bullied.
Ahahahahaha. That's the most ridiculous thing I've read during this whole incident. No one overtakes round the outside there, it's a tough ask in a GT3 car lapping a backmarker let alone in an F1 car overtaking someone of at least equal pace. Lauda was correct in what he said about Rosberg. The overtake was unnecessary there and on that lap.
Doesn't matter if someone makes the overtake there or not, rules say you can't push people off the track. If lulu left him space, nico still couldn't probably make the pass but there would be no collision and no retirements and no position swap. Lulu decided to try and force him away and this time unlike the previous he got burned and cried like a two year old trowing his toys at people.Should have nico backed down to avoid it, probably yes in most cases but this time he needed to make th

physics

August 25, 2014 4:58 PM

F1 » Hamilton: Rosberg admits he hit me deliberately


richard: sunny. physics should read the rules (20.4) and then have a look at the photo in the banner! but i guess he didnt see nicos front wheel alongside lulus head. and i may be wrong, but wasnt magnussen penalised for a similar incident? not giving alonso adequate room.
I posted the whole paragraph so people read all the cases. I am not making a case against nico and don't see why you are jumping on me... I think Nico was in the right

physics

August 24, 2014 4:48 PM

F1 » Ricciardo wins after Mercedes pair clash


107SS2009: A driving line door cannot be closed by the car in front when another car's front wing is level with the rear wheels, when Lulu closed the door on his team mate his team mate's front wing was level with Lulu himself (past the rear wheels). it was about time that Rosberg stand-up to Lulu's driving/ bullying, this was not the first time that Lulu was bullying himself around.
I am just bringing up your post again for the people that whine about ham on the next page to reread.

physics

July 17, 2014 10:08 PM

MotoGP » ‘Thumb brake’ appears on final day of Honda test


fail... now my comment... And if you read my comment again, you will see that I am speaking about the rear brake and the stuff it does... If you read it again you will see why they use it, aside that it helps with stability like you said. Also you will see why they get it on the thumb and not foot... That is what racers say, not me, I don't have a thumb brake on my bike and my riding skill is not enough to use it.


Page 2 of 16
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.