Crash.Net User: TaipantiesInAbunch

Comments rating: 19
Position in rating: 2936

Show Comments on:


October 03, 2012 2:28 AM

F1 » Hill: Hamilton had to leave McLaren

@richard Did you even read my post? Apparently, not. I never said that F1 needs Lewis PERIOD. I said, F1 NEEDS LEWIS, ALONSO, VETTEL, BUTTON, and the other top drivers to be on different teams. I thought it would be more interesting if these #1s were leading their own teams to glory. I never said that F1 would be lost without Lewis. That wasn't even part of the context of my comment. But once again, people just read what they want to read in here. The reading comprehension here is unbelievable.


October 02, 2012 3:45 PM

F1 » Rosberg ready for Hamilton challenge

I am looking forward to this pairing. I want to know how good Lewis or Rosberg really is. However, IMO, without a clear number one, Merc, or Mclaren for that matter, won't win a WCC or WDC in the near future. I think you need a team to win both and a team usually has a no. 1 and no. 2. Webber was a clear number 2 the last 2 years, despite what everyone says. Barrichelo was #2 with Brawn and Ferrari, so was Heikki with Macca and Massa in all his years at Ferrari. This is the reason, Macca has only won 1 WDC in the last 6 years. 2008 = Lewis and Heikki. You can't take away points from each other and think that you can win a double. It will always end in disaster.


October 02, 2012 2:39 PM
Last Edited 1228 days ago

F1 » Hill: Hamilton had to leave McLaren

@nick636 Nah, we're not all the same. You just made my point, mate. I clearly said that F1 needs Lewis, Alonso, Vettel and Button in DIFFERENT TEAMS. I just thought it would be more interesting and exciting if all these #1 drivers were leading their own teams. But you only read what you wanted to read, which is F1 NEEDS LEWIS! How wrong is that?

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.