Crash.Net User: wtf

Comments rating: 118
Position in rating: 838

Show Comments on:


December 18, 2014 8:41 PM
Last Edited 4 days ago

F1 » F1: Ricciardo wanted respect in 2014

People on this thread who say he is "full of himself" and "should keep his head down" need to pull their heads in. there is a difference between arrogance and confidence and you also might want to consider that he is just responding to questions being asked by journos. EDIT by CRASH.NET! Racial stirring comment removed.


December 07, 2014 8:32 PM

F1 » Ricciardo won't settle for anything less in F1 2015

Zizzu10: He won due 3 races due to the in house fighting between the ying yang brothers
That was just Belgium. In Canada the Merc's suffered the electric problems and the weather shook the order up in Hungary Koze same applies to everyone else not driving a Mercedes WO5. If the circumstances above didn't happen then Ricciardo would have had 0 wins too
Another illogical "if" based post. If you want to go with that stupid theory you could say "if" the W05 wasn't so dominant someone else would have won the WDC of "if" Alonso didn't go to Ferrari he would have won more WDCs. Many F1 races have been won in the past when others have suffered misfortune. It's part of the game. Ricciardo won 3 races and his overtaking this season was amongst the best. Give him credit where it's due.


November 16, 2014 9:44 PM

F1 » F1: Wolff: May the best man win!

ramjam 69:
tommytrojan1: P.s. Apologies for the misuse of the apostrophe. It should be 'by ITS design', without the apostrophe. I really ought to know better...
Actually, the apostrophe should be there as the design belongs to whatever 'it' is....... Actually, you are incorrect. "Its" only takes an apostrophe when it is used as a contraction of "it is", not in the ownership sense. Our language is as stupid as Bernie's points ideas!

Page 1 of 4
1 2 3 4  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.