Crash.Net User: Objective

Comments rating: 1661
Position in rating: 66

Show Comments on:


January 01, 2014 5:11 AM

F1 » F1 Driver of the Year vote: 1st

JohnMarston: If it is based on the most consistent driver, the one who extracted the most out of the car, it can't be kimi. He had a period during the middle of the season where he struggled with the car and Grojean had his measure. I believe it was when Lotus changed to the shorter wheel base car. As much as people deny it. This pole is nothing more then who is your favorite driver. If it was based on consistent results, how do you go past a driver with 13-1st's, 1-2nd, 2-3rds, 2-4th and 1 DNF due to mechanical failure. Honestly
Oops, sorry John I wasn't intimating that Kimi deserved to be number 1 based in the criteria that I outlined. I believe that Vettel clearly deserved to be number 1 if those criteria were to be applied. Kimi would still be about 3rd or 4th by my reckoning despite his no-show in the final races which I believe were due to the pay dispute and the need to have the back surgery as soon as practicable.


January 01, 2014 3:16 AM

F1 » F1 Driver of the Year vote: 1st

My definition of driver of the year is the person who extracted the best, most consistent results from the machinery at their disposal. If Bianchi was a bit more consistent I would have rated him higher than some more fancied drivers such as PDR. It's not about who scored the most points, although the points scored may reflect consistency to a degree. Also how they compared to their team mate in the same machinery is a guide.

Page 16 of 58
« 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.