Crash.Net User: TrueFan

Comments rating: 9363
Position in rating: 7

Show Comments on:


February 10, 2016 3:26 PM

MotoGP » Redding: It’s a make or break year

"It turned out we were losing six-tenths on the two straights at Sepang, which I was happy to see as it means I was riding well, it was just down to engine performance." Of course, it could be due to corner exit speed, Scott. Stoner is probably the best I've ever seen at this aspect. If you exit the corner faster, the top speed will almost always be higher. Regardless, Scott's tests are VERY promising. The Ducati suits Scott more than the Honda, so hopefully he will have a much better year this year. He's much better than his results show.


February 10, 2016 2:12 PM

MotoGP » EXCLUSIVE: Corrado Cecchinelli (MotoGP DoT) - Q&A

Track position sensing...or worse, calculating or guessing. That to me is just an abuse of technology. It can never have any practical use on production bikes, and it's utter BS on racing bikes. I still remember Crutchlow riding his Ducati when it had "lost track of where it was". It was a sad day for racing. Just ban that "position sensing" garbage. At least develop the electronics in a way that might benefit production bikes, if you must do anything.


February 08, 2016 3:03 PM

MotoGP » Stoner: Carbon frame Ducati ‘best bike’ in 2009

"...Who knows what Casey would have done if he hadnt have fallen ill that year.His results after his return seem to indicate that the carbon frame wasnt as bad as you think mate. But you obviously know better than Casey right? Well,you THINK you do!" @hoppy you can't criticise these guys like that, they're experts. After all, no-one else could ride the Ducati, and Stoner could only ride the Ducati. Look at what happened when he went to Honda...Wait a minute...bad example. More importantly, Valentino Rossi didn't like the Ducati. There's damning evidence right there. I hate to be cynical, but it's hard to take some of the comments on these threads seriously.


February 10, 2016 2:48 PM

MotoGP » PIC: Nakasuga lights it up at Sepang

Yes, it was common for a lot of the two strokers, especially the Americans. Wayne Rainey was awesome with his rear wheel spinning. If you were at a track when he raced, you needed to be on the longest corner to see the artistry of his riding, as the rear wheel hung out the whole way around. McCoy was pretty special too, especially the year he chose the smaller tyres (16.5 instead of 17 IIRC), and won some races. Eventually, everyone else went for the same option. He was called the sultan of slide... Anyway, great photo of Nakasuga san.


February 08, 2016 12:28 PM

MotoGP » Stoner: Carbon frame Ducati ‘best bike’ in 2009

It's a pity he got sick that year then....However, I seem to remember that the front end had a serious tendency to let go without warning. Mind you, by then, Bridgestone was pretty much designing their tyres to suit the Yamaha, so it might have a tyre compatibility problem. Mind you, just because he was the only one who could ride it doesn't mean it didn't have real promise. Often you need a new generation to exploit the new technology. Like when the older guys are locked into twin-spar aluminium thinking...


February 08, 2016 2:20 PM

MotoGP » Stoner: Carbon frame Ducati ‘best bike’ in 2009

Codger: TrueFan..........Did you get to read Casey's article ? You have to laugh...... all I did as tell you about it, and posted a paragraph from it .......and some idiot pressed 'disagree'.
Yes I did, as I recall, and seem to remember that it was quite an interesting insight. I can't remember any detail from it just now though...and it's a bit of a worry considering I'm a fair bit younger than you. I do suffer from the ageing effect of some of my injuries though...

Page 1 of 205
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.