Crash.Net User: Gilles

Comments rating: 1218
Position in rating: 104

Show Comments on:


July 27, 2014 8:58 PM

F1 » Hamilton ‘very shocked’ by team order

@107, wow, you are so out of touch. I can only imagine what your comment would have been if the roles were reversed, ie, Lewis starting from pole and then asking for Nico to move over? Do you dislike Lewis so much that you can't see the wood for the trees? Even Richard, who normally slags off Lewis agrees. As for the running off the track, that was later in the race and for position. Nico did the same to Kimi, I don't hear you complaint about that. Try and post unbiased opinions please.


July 28, 2014 6:59 PM

F1 » Hamilton: Usual rules didn’t apply

What I don't understand is why everybody believes Nico would have won. FFS he was stuck behind Vergne, then couldn't get within a second of Hamilton so what makes you think he could have passed Alonso, probably the hardest defender out there. All that would have happened is that they would have continued as they were but with Nico ahead of Lewis by around 1second. And anyway, the team have admitted it was wrong to ask Lewis to do that, just as Williams said it was wrong to ask Massa earlier in the year.


July 24, 2014 7:57 PM

F1 » Hamilton keen for Mercedes extension

@107, and your point is?? Does it not show a sense of loyalty from him that he wants to stay amid stories of McLaren and Ferrari showing an interest. After all, and I am sure you were one of the people who criticised him from going to Merc in the first place (I am sure you said "for the money"), he trusted what they could offer, at the time it was a massive risk. Good on Hamilton to show this level of pride to race for Mercedes.

Page 4 of 27
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.