Crash.Net User: bluebell

Comments rating: -10
Position in rating: 6216

Show Comments on:

bluebell

March 22, 2014 3:21 PM

F1 » Red Bull to appeal Ricciardo exclusion


RB chose to do what they wanted to do knowing it was against the rules . Are they that arrogant to think they would get away with it , all the teams were in the same situation but chose NOT to break the rules.RB were told on lap 5 to turn the fuel flow down and several times during the race, they are always one of the first to complain if they think another team is doing something they shouldn't now they are gettig a taste of their own medicine

bluebell

February 08, 2014 3:50 PM

F1 » Blame Ferrari for double points – Ecclestone


Double points are stupid the WDC should be won on a good car and the drivers skills the reason viewing figures have dropped is because it went to sky BBC 's F1 coverage had the biggest fan base of any sport they did a brilliant job and gave it away for money ch4 offered the same money and it would have kept it on terrestrial tv . I will not watch the last race if it is awarded double points because that will make it a farce

bluebell

February 08, 2014 3:57 PM

F1 » Blame Ferrari for double points – Ecclestone


Firestorm: It looks strange to me that Ferrari wanted double-points for the Abu Dhabi GP. They never had gone particularly well on that circuit. I thought that the organisers of this GP(being inmmensely rich) wanted to promote their country and Ecclestone couldn't resist the money they offered. Someone is lying here. I believe that Montezemolo will give an public answer very soon.
This has nothing to do with Ferrari it is Bernie's stupid idea but because it is not going down well with the fans he is trying to put the blame elsewhere



Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.