Crash.Net User: theoldgitspeaks

Comments rating: 1273
Position in rating: 151

Show Comments on:

theoldgitspeaks

October 31, 2015 1:00 PM

F1 » Honda: Discussions to supply second team ongoing


One can understand Mclarens reluctance to accept this happening, they did the deal and took the pain. If Redbull get the engine they will produce a far better chassis and if the engine improves as much as Honda think it will there is a good chance Mclaren will be shown to be wanting. However the engine makers are I believe required to supply more than one team so Mclaren must have known this would happen, the fact that it has turned out to be such a disaster is irrelevant. Ultimately Honda want to win and they will have a far better chance with Redbull. Mclaren will quickly become second in the pecking order and I believe that could cause an early divorce. Mclaren ultimately will have to find another supplier or build their own engine as they won't win as a customer.

theoldgitspeaks

October 29, 2015 3:05 PM

F1 » Bottas: 2016 will be very important for me…


Good driver, average car and unless Williams can produce a miracle and beat Mercedes at their own game it will be a wasted year. He needs to get in a top rank car and we will then see what he is capable of. People including myself are very critical but I don't think we realize the gap between the best and average. I can remember Johnny Herbert saying that when he first drove for Benneton he suddenly began to realize just how bad his Lotus had been. No customer team can win no matter how equal the supplier says they are. We are not comparing like for like.

theoldgitspeaks

November 02, 2015 9:22 AM

F1 » Horner: Independent engine supply crucial for F1


Redbull will have to take what is available to them, they had four consecutive championship years and then started to rubbish Renault for the standard of their power plant. Why would anybody apart from possibly Honda supply them only to be told their power plant is rubbish. Most teams have to take what is offered and I see no reason at all why Redbull should not do the same.

theoldgitspeaks

October 30, 2015 1:27 PM

F1 » Nearly Impossible to equalise two engine concepts – Button


There is no equality in F1, period, the best have the most money, the most say and in general the best cars (McClaren excluded) they also get a disproportionate amount of prize money and the ear of Bernie, they also bend the rules the most because they can afford to but are quick to moan if they don't like or want something. Anyone who believes F1 is an equal playing field is seriously deluding themselves. Money and ego count for a lot, ask Bernie how he has amassed a vast fortune, you won't get an answer but we know how Bernie makes money, he offers deals to one team and then quite unashamedly sells something else to another, equality does'nt come into it.

theoldgitspeaks

October 26, 2015 11:12 AM

F1 » Mercedes fear ‘Spa’ repeat as Hamilton, Rosberg tensions rise


Rosberg can't beat Hamilton on an equal playing field so he will have to find another team that can, not very likely at present but it's either that or continually finishing second, no shame in that, Hamilton is a three time world champion and has a big physiological edge on Rosberg although there is very little actual difference in their respective speed over a race distance.

theoldgitspeaks

October 24, 2015 6:58 AM

F1 » Honda emerges as Red Bull engine option


If this were to happen it would require a startling turnaround from both Honda and McLaren who had exclusive use of the power-plant, but maybe given the appalling season that they have had and with the engine rule changes coming in Honda feel the need to have more development potential. The thought of Red Bull using the Honda power-plant and trashing Mclaren would be a fascinating scenario for 2016 and I can't wait to see the look on RDs face


Page 3 of 71
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.