Crash.Net User: PaulW54

Comments rating: 947
Position in rating: 169

Show Comments on:


August 25, 2015 9:28 PM

MotoGP » Bradley Smith signs Tech 3 deal

Best news I have read on this site for weeks. It would have been a travesty if BS was not re signed for next year. Those who think he should be up there competing with the factory bikes have no concept of the reality of the difference in what he is given to the factory riders. When Cal, Bradl and Bautista were picking up the odd podium there was only the factory Hondas and Yams that were faster, Ducati was not competitive at all. Does anyone realistically think Lorenzo or Rossi would be winning races on Brads bike. I am sure some fans boys will think that their hero would still win on a Vespa, I don't. Well done BS, you deserve it.


August 25, 2015 9:44 PM

MotoGP » Marquez 'keeps fighting'

Garry: He's a good rider but I hope he doesn't get 52 points more.
"Good rider" wow that must be the understatement of the year. My postman who delivers the mail on a Honda 110 is a good rider. If MM could overhaul Jorge and Rossi it would have to be one of the best championship wins ever. He certainly is "good" enough to do it. I for one think he can and will enjoy seeing him give it his best. He has nothing to lose.


August 22, 2015 11:14 PM

MotoGP » Rossi given honorary BRDC membership

PaulW54: "Thank you for your response, please enlighten me, how many Australians are members"
If you want to know, do your own research. I'll not do it for you.
PaulW54 "of this previously unheard of club."
If you have never heard of this long-established, highly respected Club you are in no position to criticise it.
PaulW54 "Yes I will be declining my invitation, if CS27 and JB accept may reconsider. Love England but not their stuffy clubs."
You previously criticised the BRDC because it is , in your words, "pommy"., and now you state CS27 and JB as criteria ffor membership, which indicates that your agenda is purely based on location. You are also now calling the BRDC "stuffy", yet how can you claim that when according to you it is "previously unheard of"? As I said before, and as you have now connfirmed "You are just anoyher bleedin' drongo trolling for an arguement. QED.

Page 2 of 35
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.