Crash.Net User: DM52

Comments rating: 93
Position in rating: 998

Show Comments on:


January 15, 2015 12:43 PM
Last Edited 41 days ago

F1 » FIA considering Honda engine concessions

Just because Honda has been perceived to have had an extra years development time does not necessarily mean they automatically have a huge advantage. A large amount of engine problems were discovered during testing last season which is something Honda have not really started doing. I think that they should be allowed a few tokens of development this season, maybe not the full amount but enough to allow them to gain some sort of parity and performance with the rest of the grid. This is not a concession just for Honda but to all other potential engine manufacturers who are evaluating F1, If we stick with what we currently have any new manufacturers will have fewer and fewer tokens to spend as the years go on to try and catch up the far more developed and mature power units. To me it seems like the regulations were written with the assumption that only the current engine providers would be competing under the new regs.


January 15, 2015 3:30 PM

F1 » FIA considering Honda engine concessions

The '1 extra year of development' argument I think needs to be taken with a large pinch of salt. Honda announced their return as an engine supplier in May 2013, granted they may have started work before the announcement however all three existing suppliers had been dyno testing their power units since August 2012 with Ferrari being the last to announce they had done so.


August 29, 2014 12:59 AM

F1 » Mattiacci keen to lift F1 engine freeze

Development is not totally frozen though, if you google '2014 f1 engine tokens' the second hit is the FIA's outline on how they are controlling engine development. For 2015 teams can focus on 50% of their engine parts for development, there is a sliding scale as the years roll on reducing the amount of development manufacturers can do.

Page 1 of 4
1 2 3 4  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.