Crash.Net User: rdc

Comments rating: 1521
Position in rating: 114

Show Comments on:

rdc

February 09, 2016 4:35 AM

MotoGP » Stoner: Carbon frame Ducati ‘best bike’ in 2009


Yearby23: I still remember when everyone wrote Stoner off from his illness, that he would never win again when he came back. Won by 15 seconds in the wet at Sepang. There hasn't been a dominant race winner in the top class by that margin since.
Pedrosa won by 37 seconds at Valencia in 2012, after starting from pitlane (to grab slicks), and slowing down in the last 6ish laps to the point that riders were unlapping themselves. And was also catching Lorenzo quickly who started from the front row on slicks. Stoner's Sepang win was probably a more level playing field in that everyone was on wets for the entire race distance.

rdc

December 22, 2015 11:15 AM

WSBK » WSBK Rider of the Year 2015 - 3rd


cfsteezy: Rea wont be champ next year. I said it here first. Sykes champ 2016. Disagree all you like but a i will say, 'i told you so'... Rea is great, not god. And i stand by the commentators that the 2015 rule changes put sykes and his team on the back foot. Since when has sykes ever had such bad tyre issues? Never. So if thats fixed this season then he is unstopable
How about 2012, where he faded back with tire issues frequently.

rdc

December 20, 2015 9:57 PM

MotoGP » MotoGP Star of the Year vote: 4th


Hobo:
Hobo: Didnt #93 win moto 3 title, Moto 2 and 2 motogp titles? Or maybe I'm wrong and it was MV .?
Bradley Smith, Scott Redding etc.
Neither Smith or Redding won any title, Vinales only has the Moto3 title (but imho he would have won the Moto2 this season). Marquez races and won the 125cc title (and then the Moto2, and two MotoGP titles)


Page 1 of 63
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.