Crash.Net User: Mustafur

Comments rating: 771
Position in rating: 194

Show Comments on:


December 02, 2014 7:19 AM

F1 » Red Bull will still back Lynn for F1

richard: vettel, ricciardo, kvyat so far, and that is only after 6 years as a junior team, and when rbr already had two incumbent older drivers for the first year or so. and then, look at how many drivers went forward after driving for a perennial back marker....minardi. oh wait...str is the continuation of minardi.... that must say something,
Trulli, Fisichella, Webber, Alonso, these all within about the same amount of years.


November 29, 2014 10:11 AM

F1 » Raikkonen expected difficult Ferrari F1 return

Marybeth: I found it interesting that as in Spain when Kimi qualified ahead of FA, they brought FA in for the first pit stop, instead of their first driver on the track, so that FA could leap frog Kimi on the track. In Abu Dhabi, when KR outqualified FA again, they brought FA in first again. FA had a clause in his contract that he said he had to be first, even when he wasn't the best, & Ferrari did that.
He was no where near Alonso for it to really be an issue, only At Spain would I say he genuinely had more pace.


October 20, 2014 7:02 AM

F1 » Sainz Jr: My dream is to become Toro Rosso F1 driver

Torro Rosso would be insane to keep vergne, sure he has scored more points the Kyvat but his overall speed this season has been surpassed by Kyvat pretty much from day 1. Vergne is on his 3rd season.and would be expected to beat Kyvat in every department and whilst I think he is a good driver and deserves a seat in F1 he doesn't make sense being at STR next year. Redbull don't need him in STR to compare Verstappen they have more then enough data to get all the information on every driver they ever had. Sainz won F3.5 that it self surpasses Vettel and Ricciardos F3.5 Performances.

Page 2 of 35
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.