Crash.Net User: Bmendon

Comments rating: 298
Position in rating: 602

Show Comments on:


March 10, 2016 7:21 PM

F1 » Vettel cautiously optimistic on closing gap to Mercedes

In theory it is entirely possible that Mercedes have reach reached a point of diminishing returns in their development of the PU. At the close of the last season they were down to looking at their fuel composition and efficencies and analyzing using thermal energy more effectively. On the other hand Ferrari has had an opportunity to correct past mistakes on their chassis and PU. Just a thought.


March 22, 2016 5:58 PM

F1 » Vettel frustrated by need for ‘embarrassing’ qualifying U-turn

TomTom: If the reason to change qualifying format is to enlightened Saturday show, why not use qualifying format similar to motogp ? With FP4 and only two qualifying groups Q1 & Q2, Top 5 or so in FP4 goes straight to Q2, the rest goes to Q1 ( and top 5 or so in Q1 goes to Q2). So at the end total 10 or so drivers compete in Q1. Will be more entertaining. Just an opinion
If it ain't broke, why fix it? There is no reason to change the format that I can possibly fathom.


March 18, 2016 12:07 AM

F1 » Vettel sure Ferrari is closer to Mercedes than last year

I think Mercedes has reached a point of diminishing returns in their development. My guess is that they are down to fine tuning the most minute detail to eek out an extra 10th. Ferrari had the biggest leap to make and judging from their new chassis and PU, they just might be close. Vettel is smart enough to point out that they intend to be close but they don't know how close they really are.

Page 1 of 12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.