Crash.Net User: Mintox

Comments rating: 499
Position in rating: 219

Show Comments on:


April 03, 2014 12:50 AM
Last Edited 20 days ago

F1 » Ricciardo hit with 10 place grid penalty

107SS2009: Mintox, And what makes you think that all you attributed to me doesn’t apply to you and your likes such as the giveaway?. .
Sometimes its not what you say, its how you say it that puts people offside mate. I dont see too many other people on here telling everyone they know better. As far as the fuel regs go, you cant declare a sensor faulty (FIA's own admission) then give a competitor another sensor which fails, and then tell them to use the first sensor you declared faulty enough to be changed, and then penalize them when they dont trust the sensors readings. Its ludicous. The FIA are human, so they're able to make mistakes, and this is why your "FIA is infallible" argument holds no water imo.


April 01, 2014 2:59 AM

F1 » Ricciardo hit with 10 place grid penalty

107SS2009: Giveway, you have now confirmed my assessment of you as being spot on and that also confirmed that I have beaten you to it (assessment of you being not possible to talk technical matters with).
Its not Giveaway that is making himeslf hard to understand or agree with mate. Your "FIA is God and can do no wrong" stance and condescending attitude to everyone on here is wearing very thin. Just because people do not agree with you does not necessarily make them wrong. Many people have valid viewpoints on here.


March 28, 2014 12:13 AM

F1 » ‘I don’t want to be a one hit wonder’ – Ricciardo

People deriding Dan for his Aus GP performance by going on about how his car had extra performance over the others, therefore it doesnt count, have no idea. Are you deriding Rosberg's win because his car had extra performance over everyone else in the field? I doubt it. The point is Dan drove a great race and showed if the car has pace he can get the job done, thats what he's talking about in relation to not being a one hit wonder. Hopefully when he does it again the next time, the FIA wont be able to take it off him because of thier own self admitted faulty measuring systems or any other technicality. Good luck for this weekend DR.


March 23, 2014 11:59 PM

F1 » Red Bull appeal date set

107SS2009: There is no way they can prove the FIA sensor readings wrong.
They don't have to prove the FIA sensor readings were wrong, the FIA has already done that for them. Exactly why do you think the FIA told them to swap it out in the first place??? \blockquote] Exactly Bob. The FIA cant swap a sensor out because it was faulty, have the next one fail and then give the original sensor back during the race and expect the race team to believe in the readings it is giving them. If they can prove the car didnt exceed the correct fuel flow rate then the FIA have no case, despite certain people on here's insistence that they do. I hope RB win and the FIA have to find a better, more accurate & consistent way to measure the fuel flow rate or abandon it altogether as the current situation is a farce.


March 18, 2014 2:45 AM

F1 » What we learned at the Australian Grand Prix

Bring back the real racing. Full fuel, tyres that will last more than ten laps, (they can still have two different compulsory compounds) and engines that sound like formula one engines. Put a kers on it if you want to test technology but dont let if interrupt the racing. Most F1 fans couldnt give a rats about super clean environmental racing, just give us the sound & sights, and the best guys going flat out for the whole race.


March 21, 2014 1:45 AM

F1 » Red Bull to appeal Ricciardo exclusion

You cant give a team a sensor, admit its faulty enough for you to give them another one, then realise that the new one is worse, tell them to go back to the faulty one they first had and then penalize them when they dont rely on the information its providing to race at thier best. Thats just ludicrous and smacks of the FIA trying to protect its agreement with the sensor supplier only (coz lets face it, the supplier would of paid bulk money to win the f1 contract). If you cant measure a restriction accurately for all cars, then you have to find a way to do so or dont use it as a restriction. If RB can show they didnt exceed the fuel flow rate they should have all points restored and the FIA needs to find a better way to measure or restrict the fuel flow rate for everyone equally. On another note, I have actually "liked" two of Richards posts and i'm feeling a bit strange about it..

Page 3 of 12
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.