Crash.Net User: McMerc

Comments rating: 37
Position in rating: 1644

Show Comments on:

McMerc

December 24, 2014 8:12 PM

F1 » F1 Driver of the Year 2014: 1st


LoveF1: I'm probably the exception here but I don't think Dan is the driver of the year. I think Lewis is! There were so many situations where Lewis could have put a foot wrong but didnt. He demonstrated his full maturity as a driver and claimed the championship with loads to spare at the end. The double points scenario could have thrown him in previous years but he held his nerve and grabbed the initiative from Rosberg on so many occasions in different races. And if people are arguing that Dan smashed Vettel (which he may have done), then Lewis also definitely smashed Rosberg. No, Rosberg may not be a 4-time world champ, but he's no slouch and he WAS driving that Merc. Lewis can only destroy whichever teammate he is given and he did that convincingly.
Hahah... Fanaticism is so mind-numbing... You should change your name from 'LoveF1' to 'LoveLewis'! Lewis is good, but I doubt he would have won a single race this season if he had been on the Red Bull, whereas

McMerc

December 24, 2014 8:14 PM
Last Edited 11 hours ago

F1 » F1 Driver of the Year 2014: 1st


Lewis is good, but I doubt he would have won a single race this season if he had been on the Red Bull, whereas Daniel won three. Furthermore, Daniel would have been champion had he been on the Mercedes, beating Rosberg on racedays and, quite surely, beating him on Saturdays too (Edit - which Lewis didn't do). You really can't see it any other way... That illustrates how much better Daniel was this year over anyone else. Lewis was champion by virtue of his car, Daniel performed outside the limitations of his equipment.

McMerc

November 23, 2014 11:55 PM

F1 » Hamilton the best on the F1 grid – Rosberg


What Nico should have said was: "The best car-driver combination won." But his gesture in defeat was gracious and that is appreciated. Lewis is so gifted that he really should have dominated this season like Mansell in '92 and Schumi in, say, 2002. That it went down to the last race doesn't speak very highly of him, considering that the untalented but amenable Rosberg was in the other car. Ricciardo was always measured but bold and he produced week in-week out. Only when his car was substantially bad was he mired in lower placings. But this is good for Daniel: to show he can fight with lesser equipment, when the Campionship is his, no-one will dare say it was solely because of his superior machinery.

McMerc

August 26, 2013 3:41 AM

MotoGP » Rossi 'won't give up' in pursuit of top three


Former motorcycle GP racer Daryl Beattie summed it up pretty well last night on TV: Rossi just can't compete with the newer generation, and I agree. Every generation is better than the one before. It's not a shame for Rossi, no disrespect, it's just the way it is. He's done what he could do and did it well. I think he should consider retiring and giving up that ride to someone who would be on a par with the younger riders because, as it is, that YAMAHA is just making up the numbers.

McMerc

August 20, 2013 2:52 AM

F1 » Ricciardo deal done, to be announced at Spa?


I'm extremely happy for Daniel. People whinge that RB didn't give the seat to a top driver, but I digress. Who says Daniel is not a top driver? Just because he hasn't driven in a top car doesn't mean he's not. Was McLaren wrong to give a drive to Kimi in 2002? Was Renault wrong to give Alonso a drive in 2003? People are so in love with personalities that they forget that the field is full of people with potential to be the next big thing (Perez, Hulkenberg, Bianchi to name a few). I'm sure we'll see Daniel giving Vettel a good run for his money, not like Grosjean, but more like Hamilton to Alonso. Here's hoping!



Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.