Crash.Net User: Thepain

Comments rating: -117
Position in rating: 8577

Show Comments on:


January 23, 2015 7:09 AM

F1 » Optimistic Hulkenberg out to build on ‘best F1 season’

The Hulk and Perez are both good drivers. In a battle for victory, between the two my money would be on Perez. He has shown what he is capable of doing if the conditions are great. Hulk, although quick and worthy of his seat does have the tendency to maintain position if his in a good position. Which is not bad, but how great was the Perez and Alonso battle? And that is what I want to see


January 14, 2015 1:27 PM

F1 » Ferrari: Engine development ‘first victory’

Thepain: Just a bit of topic (walking into a ambush) . These changes at Ferrari and hopeful progress does make me wonder if the number #44 driver are not aiming the Kimi seat for 2016. Hope 2015 is awsome
You're not really suggesting that all these changes at Ferrari are for the sake of Lulu are you? I have a horrible feeling that you are!
Tai, not my point. Lewis indicated many a times that he wants a Ferrari and with the changes happening his interest might re awoke and if the team does prove to be on the rise....we could see another #Still I Rise a.k.a A car 2sec quicker then the rest


January 14, 2015 6:32 AM

F1 » Ferrari: Engine development ‘first victory’

Just a bit of topic (walking into a ambush) . These changes at Ferrari and hopeful progress does make me wonder if the number #44 driver are not aiming the Kimi seat for 2016. The commentators always says that f1 needs a competitive Ferrari, I never seemed to get that. Surely we want a competitive grid and if a loophole is what gives that bit of hope why not. The problem is, that Renault and Newey are known to make the most of loopholes in the rules. The likes of Merc and Mecca are just able to throw money at a problem and hope for the best. I think Ferrari was to focused on the prancing of the horse and not the horse self. Hope 2015 is awsome


November 28, 2014 6:47 AM

F1 » Hamilton: Rosberg and I will handle 2015 better

The problem that the 'haters' has with Lewis's career is that everything he does is seen as Legendary and no-one will ever be that great. It is an image created by Lewis, endorsed by the media and elevated by some fans. The image of Lewis is just a bit to much for some who try to put sense in the senseless Lewis following. But to discredit him from his achievement is just as senseless. Nico could not keep up in the fastest car. There have been some calls that cost Lewis championships and this one was by far his best call and it paid off. Nico kept coming second when the race was on. Easy to stay second. Does not make him the equal to Lewis that could open a 2 sec gap to him in the same car. Richard that car caught fire in quali as well not practice. But this is basically prototypes, of course there will be mistakes. I agree that this type of dominance is a bit to much, great for Merc but not for the sport.


November 13, 2014 10:25 AM

F1 » Rosberg: I’m in good shape

Mokoboke Machaba:
Taz: Rosberg needs to force lulu into a mistake, maybe drive him of the circuit like lulu usually does to him. it didn't work to well in Spa but he should do it just to see the look on Lauda's face.
Stop taking cheap drugs Bra.
Bra? fantasizing about your sister again :p
"Bra" is the South African version of "Man"


October 30, 2014 12:46 PM

F1 » What a difference a year makes for Bottas

The Hulk in that Williams with Bottas would have been great. Bottas has risen to the occasion. Why is there a constant dispute about great cars, making the drivers. So by that logic, all should get crap cats and race. Thinking about it, that would save f1. Other than spending millions and doing a great job and then the drivers getting criticized for doing a good job on track. Because a crap driver will be crap anyway, doesn't matter how great the car, Bruno Senna. Save cost, make crap and let see them race for glory

Page 3 of 22
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.