Crash.Net User: bug1050

Comments rating: 20
Position in rating: 2203

Show Comments on:

bug1050

March 20, 2014 4:57 PM

F1 » Red Bull to appeal Ricciardo exclusion


richard: ty. like you, I am sitting on the fence. I can see both sides of the debate. but that has to be remembered is that it was a STEWARDS decision in Melbourne, and not an fia decision. rbr are appealing so that the fia are forced into a final decision. if rbr can PROVE that their flow never exceeded the limit, then the fia could have egg on their face for providing defective equipment that caused a team to be compromised
Remember Richard that the DSQ came about not because of the flow limit being exceeded but because RBR chose to use their own flow sensor over the FIA flow sensor without their permission.

bug1050

March 20, 2014 4:59 PM

F1 » Red Bull to appeal Ricciardo exclusion


Taipan:
simon.tay.509: The rule says max 100kg/h, not max of the sensor reading. They have a case there
That's my reading of things, IF RBR can prove that the car never used more than 100kg/h then they didn't break the rule. And I'm pretty sure that they must be able to prove that or they wouldn't be appealing.
Remember that the DSQ came about not because of the flow limit being exceeded but because RBR chose to use their own flow sensor over the FIA flow sensor without their permission

bug1050

March 13, 2014 8:22 PM

MotoGP » Moto2: Lowes makes mark despite wrist pain


Insidejob: Looks 'sticky.' Hope we'll see him near the front. I didn't think he'd perform so well on the Speed Up. They're running a carbon swing arm. I suppose it is their own bespoke chassis but can't find any info on it. Why aren't any other teams using it?
Qmmf are the only other team using the speed up chassis but I don't know how similar they are. Ant west is very experienced but still can't match the pace of lowes, if that's a benchmark to go by??


Page 1 of 2
1 2  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.