Crash.Net User: Lodge

Comments rating: -41
Position in rating: 6656

Show Comments on:


September 07, 2014 12:08 PM

WSBK » Melandri denies WSBK title contender Guintoli

EmmBee1964: Really Lodge? He has come out ahead in may more races this year than Rae. I think he would welcome Rae to be his team mate next year. He doesn't need more skill, more likely more changes to tyre choice/suspension settings.
What Tom really needs is an Aprilia, which is a MotoGP bike with lights (that's why you pay so much for them in the shops. And of course the works bikes are another step up from that). Next race should be good.


September 07, 2014 10:44 AM

WSBK » Melandri denies WSBK title contender Guintoli

Tom fortunate his team-non-mate collided with Marco. Tom maybe buying a present for Marco's new baby, because of the way the race turned out? Looked like Tom needed more skill to pass JR unless he was feeling guilty about the stupid/dangerous swerve to the left he made off the start? He needs to get his head together for the next race! Next year he may be struggling to beat Johnny Rea if they're in the same team.


September 01, 2014 5:02 PM

MotoGP » Pedrosa: No answer to Marquez and Lorenzo

Evolution: Honest Dani and thats why i like him. Yes he had to admitt that he and rossi both ruin there tyres becoz of the battles they had with dovi and alex. look the problem is both with vale and dani is there qualifying. they need to improve there qp becoz now days its very tough to do well from 5th or 6th positions.
Except that Dani won from 5th position at Brno. It's not that far back and Dani used to be the fastest starter. It probably was the bumps like TrueFan says. A no F1 track like the proposed Circuit of Wales can't come soon enough for lightweight riders.

Page 1 of 6
1 2 3 4 5 6  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.