Crash.Net User: ridelikeaturtle

Comments rating: 103
Position in rating: 1055

Show Comments on:


August 20, 2015 8:16 PM

F1 » Kimi: I’m sure we’ll have many happy days

Last year's Ferrari wasn't good and so 2014 is irrelevant. Kimi's made a few too many mistakes this year, but has also been unlucky (disadvantaged from factors he does not control). I'm sure Ferrari have a formula to measure drivers based on all racing factors, and Kimi is certainly among the top and hasn't lost the ability to race hard. Without another available driver who is the next coming of Senna, he's the best driver fit. Throw in his popularity and the timing of Bottas's contract w/Williams ending, and it's a no-brainer to re-sign him.


November 06, 2013 2:14 PM

F1 » Webber: The right time to stop

I laugh when I hear, "Webber gets the same equipment as Vettel." Clearly this has not been the case in instances in the past, and while I'd normally consider cases where one driver's car constantly breaks down compared to his teammate that it's a driver difference... but when it's your KERS or alternator? As if Webber is pressing the KERS button wrong so that it breaks? I'm not suggesting a conspiracy, but bias and effort are heavily on Vettel's side of the garage at RBR - he wins championships, after all.


November 06, 2013 12:24 PM

F1 » F1 points to adopt ATP approach?

Some races worth more than others? Stupid idea. If you want to make it interesting, get rid of qualifying and make the starting order the reverse of the points standings: to win the championship, you have to start last. Tied drivers do a coin flip to see who's in front. (OK, that's fairly stupid too, but at least it'd make for interesting races, not snore-fests like we've got now.)

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.