Crash.Net User: otto6457

Comments rating: 258
Position in rating: 456

Show Comments on:

otto6457

December 05, 2014 12:27 AM

F1 » Force India switches to Toyota wind tunnel


And with Haas F1 joining the fray in 2016, and with Haas being the sole owner of one of the only full size wind tunnels with rolling road technology and 180 mph wind speed capability, (the Windshear Tunnel) how much is Ferrari set to gain? Haas is going to be running basically a Ferrari customer car in 2016. That cozy relationship didn't happen by accident and being able to give back to Ferrari this kind of telemetry on their own car in Haas colors can't be under estimated. Ferrari might have just moved from having the worst wind tunnel in F1, to having access to a tunnel and telemetry no one else is even close to.

otto6457

November 15, 2014 3:08 PM

F1 » F1: Vettel set for Red Bull swansong


JoeKlip: I think Vettel best days in F1 are behind him. Without all the superior RedBull aerodyanmics and chassis balance, Vettel is not the same driver since.
This is going to be an interesting journey for Vettle. I don't think Ferrari are currently capable of delivering Vettle a car he can challenge with. I also don't think Vettle will be able to extract as much out of the awful Ferrari as Alonso has. It doesn't look like there is going to be any meaningful unfreeze to the P/U development for 2015, so Vettle and Ferrari will still be 70HP behind the Mercs with terrible aero to boot. Yep....going to be interesting. Probably not successful.....but interesting.

otto6457

November 06, 2014 12:33 AM

F1 » Horner: F1 rules used to change to slow Red Bull


107SS2009: BtwnDitches, You should re read the rules about the PU’S supplied and to be used by teams as well as customers, there cannot be two PU versions of any one make in use.
But what this ignores is that there can certainly be more than one software package in use. There is no way the customer teams will have the same software as the Mercs run in their cars.


Page 1 of 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.