NASCAR » Edwards-Harvick feud takes centre stage


Carl Edwards has more than just his feud with Brad Keselowski to keep an eye on this weekend in Bristol

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

fritz - Unregistered

March 20, 2010 2:14 PM

The 99 has too much difficulty holding a line. Contact is often corner to corner vs. wheel to wheel or side to side. Carl too often relies far too much upon other drivers to give a little more than a little in order to escape wrecking. I agree that the 12 is overdrawn at the good will bank amoung several series and individuals. But given the rules of the day, Krash-A-Lotski was not incorrect at Talladega. That was the 99 no less than when the 18 tried one extra move on Tony Stewart and wound up in flight school. I may not be a rabid 29 fan, but what the Harvicks have built in the truck and n'wide series earns them more respect and consideration for their idea of competetive behavior.

sokudo - Unregistered

March 21, 2010 12:59 AM

fritz while i agree with most of what you said, carl's issue with harvick isn't to do with the on-track achievements, it's to do with what harvick is like as a person, and as far as i know, like kyle busch, he comes across as a bit of a tool. that being said, i don't know them personally so i can't really say that's true. it's one of those things. you have cliques in school. this is the same deal. some drivers get along better than others and it's not necessarily a battle of good and bad but 2 people who have had a scuffle (handbags in most cases) and they don't like each other because of it.

FilthyMcNasty - Unregistered

March 21, 2010 6:43 PM

I agree with you both in many ways and I like both of these drivers. The 99, however, is much more dangerous on the track and is begnning to lose my respect. Is he trying to outdo M Waltrip for causing more accidents? Maybe Edwards should consider being a team owner instead of a driver. :?

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.