WSBK » Interview with James Toseland's crew chief


Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest
Filter Comments: All | Registered

bazzab - Unregistered

March 18, 2010 12:20 PM


Seems a bit of a risk to me to put Carchedi into this melting pot when he has only really proved himself in BSB. i wonder if JT had any input in the process ?? But if it starts to go pear shaped and success does'nt come this year, who will we blame. JT does'nt become a bad rider overnight, but i suppose he will get all the stick as usual. as a comparison who honestly did'nt think that Checa was past his best ?? and look what happened at PI. I hope that the team can gel and they get success. sooner rather than later......

Hedgeholer - Unregistered

March 18, 2010 12:23 PM

Probably not Jimmy, but I'd expect to see Toseland & Camier both fighting for the top step later in the season and a real prospect of a World Title next year.

I'm not saying its a 'done deal' (remember how long it took Yamaha to sort Rossi's chatter problems with the M1)more that I'd certainly not rule either out just yet.

bazzab - Unregistered

March 18, 2010 12:33 PM


To Real Road Racing Blog
If you had any inside knowledge at all you would know that your statement is completley wrong regarding the toseland/edwards crew chief problem :rolleyes:. it was 100% Poncharal's decision. so let's not keep harping on about this please :rolleyes:

Page 1 of 6
1 2 3 4 5 6  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please do not post any personal abuse or attacks.

  • (this will never be displayed, but is required for email notification of follow-up comments)

    Email me when this topic is updated.

Note: Your comment may take a few minutes to appear

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.