WRC POLL: Is it time for Rally 2, aka SupeRally, to be axed?

Vote in our latest poll and give us your thoughts on if you think Jean Todt is correct in wanting to axe Rally 2, aka, the SupeRally...

FIA president Jean Todt said today he would like to see the Rally 2 rule currently in use in the World Rally Championship come to an end [see separate story - click here].

Rally 2, previously known as SupeRally, gives drivers the opportunity to rejoin an event on the day after they retire - albeit with a time penalty for each stage missed.

The SupeRally was introduced in 2005, after being trialled on the Acropolis Rally back in 2004.

This year it remains, although individual events have been given the choice whether or not to opt out of using it, as has happened for round one, Rallye Monte Carlo.

Its use has always been somewhat controversial, and while purists argue it is not in keeping with the spirit of the sport, it does have some merits, especially as it gives young drivers the chance to continue to gain experience, even if they go out early on. The ability to re-start can also be invaluable for sponsors, who continue to gain exposure, and it shouldn't be forgotten that it can also be a good thing for spectators, particularly those at events, as even if a top driver does go out on day one, then they can still see them in action the following day. Indeed one of the reasons it was brought in, was because there wasn't enough manufacturers competing and this was one way to help keep numbers up right until the final day.

What do you think though?
Should the SupeRally be axed?
Does it need tweaking?

Vote now...


You can also share your thoughts and opinions in the comments thread here.

Tagged as: FIA , Jean Todt , superally , Todt , Rally 2

Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
Jean Todt (FRA), President of FIA

Start the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2017 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.