WSBK » WSBK Qualifying times (2) - Nurburgring.

Sort Comments: Oldest | Newest

pagoda - Unregistered

June 14, 2008 1:26 PM

surprise ,surprise, the Ducati over half a second quicker. BORING, thanks WSBK for destroying a great series,just like British Superbikes. How have Ducati got the powers that be in their back pocket??

belly - Unregistered

June 14, 2008 1:42 PM

Pagoda ... how about looking at the figures a little more closely you ******. Positions 2 to 10 are covered by less than half a second. How much closer do yo uwant it?? Bayliss put together ONE white hot lap to get the break - the last lap of the session. Befor that last lap the top 10 were within that half second!! Open your eyes!!

eadgbe - Unregistered

June 14, 2008 2:42 PM

Power circuit? It's blatently obvious that the Duke's have got less top end power than the fours. Their advantage lies in power spread and the fact that they're a highly developed bike

6mbt9 - Unregistered

June 14, 2008 2:51 PM

Ducati are forced to use air restrictors to restrict top end speed artificially. But their 200cc extra displacement torque curve has a huge advantage out of the corners. This also helps Ducati save their tires more than the fours.

This is such a fake race. Ducati is a dirty company. Australians are dirty riders.

belly - Unregistered

June 14, 2008 5:50 PM

Yes haha, "Australian" is a race: as is Italian, Spanish, English, German, Japanese, American, etc etc. Gotta agree with Lucifer: Just a cheap racist comment. Which of the Australian riders are dirty 6mbt9?? Add Brookes, Pitt, McCoy, Aithchison, Parkes .. Stoner, Vermuelen, West from MotoGP to the list Lucifer put together .... You make a general comment like that then run and hide. it would be interesting to hear back from you about which one from th elist is a dirty rider. I don't expect a snivelling coward like you will return post though - not enough intestinal fortitude

Page 1 of 2
1 2  »

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.