WSBK »

EXCLUSIVE Andrea Buzzoni (BMW) - Q&A

At the beginning of this year I didn't start with the atmosphere I wanted because of the merged structure but now the integration of the team components is fantastic and from this point view the decision is a real pity. It's been a very positive experience though.

Crash.net:
How about the staff and mechanics?

Andrea Buzzoni:
The race environment doesn't offer the same stability as other environments and the staff will have to find and follow new projects. They are employed by Feel Racing though and I'm very confident that they'll be successful as they are some of the best in the paddock. I'm confident that with their track record, Feel Racing will have something arranged for next year. Our two riders contracts both run out at the end of the year.

Crash.net:
Do you know the situation with Marco and Chaz's rides for next year?

Andrea Buzzoni:
No. They only received the telephone call from me recently. It was a difficult call to make. They may have had doubts but I think it was a surprise for them and most people. They're now starting to look. I'm not doing anything officially, but unofficially I will do what I can for the sake of our relationship

Crash.net:
What will happen as regards BMW in Superstock or other series such as BSB?

Andrea Buzzoni:
Superstock we have to see as next year could be the last year of Superstock anyway due to the changes. For series such as BSB there will still be a motorcycle sport division at BMW and we'll seek to cater for what BMW call customer sport. Customer sport would mean all national championships. How exactly that's going to happen I'm not sure, but probably there'll be central technical support with maybe local contact points.

Crash.net:
Are you aware of which changes Dorna are going to make?

Andrea Buzzoni:
When you change things people tend to be scared, but I see no negative aspects to them. Let's be clear, a WSBK bike isn't a production machine, it's a prototype, and we're talking about 240bhp here so a Superbike has nothing to do with the production bike.

When BMW projected the S1000RR we wanted a bike to win on the market and we did it, and you can see how difficult it has been to go from a market winning bike to one that wins on the track. Other companies projected a bike for Superbikes and then derived the road bike. If you see the cost of going from a very successful road bike to winning on track you can see why the changes are necessary.

The question is 'Does the spectacular show of WSBK depend on horsepower?' and I believe the answer is 'No'. Likewise, if you ask 'Does the spectacular show of WSBK depend on electronics?', I would also say 'No'. Look at British Superbikes, that's a great show. The concept works.

The Dorna plans are not similar, but have some relationship to BSB - you'll have 200 or 205 horsepower and you'll have the stock engine and electronics. The difference between Marco Melandri (Superbike) and Sylvain Barrier (Superstock) is more or less two seconds - 0.8 is probably just the tyre, the difference between Superbike and Superstock if you use the Superstock engine and electronics is probably just 0.5 seconds and the cost of the 0.5 is embarrassing!

From what I know, the new regulations should be Superstock engine and electronics with a free chassis and Superbike tyres, though that still has to be confirmed.

Crash.net:
Thanks a lot Andrea.

Andrea Buzzoni:
It's a pleasure.



Related Pictures

Click on relevant pic to enlarge
BMW launches its 2013 WSBK campaign [pic credit: BMW Motorrad]
Milwaukee BMW garage, Malaysian WSBK 2016
Milwaukee BMW hospitality, Dutch WSBK 2016
Milwaukee BMW, Dutch WSBK 2016
Akrapovic exhaust on Brookes BMW, Dutch WSBK 2016
Akrapovic Exhaust on Abraham’s BMW, Dutch WSBK 2016
Milwaukee BMW table, Dutch WSBK 2016
Team Milwaukee BMW, WSBK Race2, Aragon 2016
Team Milwaukee BMW, Aragon WSBK 2016
Team Milwaukee BMW, Aragon WSBK 2016
Akrapovic exhaust, Torres` BMW. Thai WSBK 2016
Akrapovic exhaust, Brookes BMW. Thai WSBK 2016
Akrapovic exhaust, Brookes BMW. Thai WSBK 2016
Abraham`s BMW, Jerez WSBK Test Jan 26-26 2016
Abraham`s BMW, Jerez WSBK Test Jan 26-26 2016
Abraham`s BMW, Jerez WSBK Test Jan 26-26 2016
Abraham`s BMW, Jerez WSBK Test Jan 26-26 2016
Abraham`s BMW, Jerez WSBK Test Jan 26-26 2016

Join the conversation - Add your comment

Please login or register before adding your comments.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.


TalentFan

August 06, 2013 7:27 PM

Interesting that a guy IN the know and IN the series says that ultimate horsepower and electronics is NOT required for great racing, and cites BSB as the example. I've said these same things on here, and people go off on one that it'd be sacrilege to rein the bikes in a bit! Thing is... what Andrea says is true - and not JUST for WSBK but for MotoGP too. But don't look for any sense arriving there. It does look like Superstock 1000 will become superfluous though. Mind you - if that resulted in a larger WSBK grid with even more strong competition and teams from the 2 - who'd really mind? All sounds good to me - less factory, more independence, less electronics. I'm still waiting though for Dorna to make a royal hash of the regs so its another MotoGP mess though.

moto4moto4

August 05, 2013 10:01 AM

As the guy says, WSB is not production based but prototype and this was not it's intended purpose. It should be much nearer to road bikes though reading his beliefs of the direction does not make happy reading: stock engine and electronics with open chassis! Surely, the first and foremost fundamental should be a standard chassis. With this standard electronics is a great idea as will please manufacturers (purpose to race for this new development area) and benefit customers (standard stuff will be great) and improve racing (no more GPS traction control etc...). Then I think the class needs some performance balancing (like bsb?) so all road bikes don't end up revvy idiotic machines- though, I'm not certain this part is essential. Then have any further homologated parts (therefore available to the general public, perhaps even for a set cost to stop silly money being spent) only permitted that are bolt-ons. With all this, any team (or individual for that matter) can buy and build a



© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.