You are about to report the comment below to the Crash.Net moderators as being abusive.
An abusive comment may contain profanity, personal attacks or commercial SPAM.
Please do not report this comment as being abusive if you simply disagree with the
comment posted. If this is the case then you can click on the "disagree" icon () in the upper right
of the comment's post to show your dissatisfaction.
Crash.Net moderators will view all reported comments and will act as they deem necessary.
This may be editing the comment or total deletion.
There’s so much contradiction around today. Most here agree MotoGP has lost it’s spectacle and needs changing to retain its Premier status. But every time changes are suggested there’s a barrage of opposition!
Likewise, everyone knows WSB lap times are too close to MotoGP, but at the first mention of lower spec WSB bikes there’s a litany of criticism.
Most observers, me included, don’t know the detailed differences between “Stock” and “Super” classes because currently there are too many variations on the same 600s/1000s theme. Similar, but slightly lower specced classes used to be created when the prime class became oversubscribed. Now that the prime classes need more teams on the grid there is no longer a need for sub-prime classes. So amalgamating “Stock” and “Super” classes at an intermediate level will have beneficial effect.
In MotoGP, Factory Proddy racers will oust CRTs, bringing fuller grids, closer racing and bringing back spectacle.
Dorna-knocking is much too prevalent.