18 July 2013
Gabriele Tarquini, Honda - Q&A
Honda's Gabriele Tarquini talks to Crash.net about his 2013 World Touring Car Championship campaign to date
Experienced Touring Car driver Gabriele Tarquini has had a somewhat rocky 2013 with the all-new Castrol JAS Honda Civic racing team.
After scoring a victory and consistent podiums in the early stages of the season, the Italian has seen his fortunes change completely and the last three events have yielded not much more than bad luck for the 2009 FIA WTCC champion.
Tarquini managed to find a few minutes to speak with Dexter Fielding at this years' Goodwood Festival of Speed and here he discusses the highs and lows of 2013 and the next generation of regulations, which come into play next season...
How has the first half of the season been for you with Honda?
It's been unbelievably positive from my point of view. We've started with a new chassis and engine, but the car was immediately competitive. I scored two pole positions and a victory near the beginning of the season, so that was a period of good results for me and the team - especially in race one at Slovakia when all three cars on the podium were Honda, which was emotional.
You've recently been plagued with bad luck but what do you expect for the 'fly-away' races?
It is still a young car, we need more experience to discover the potential of the car and you need at least a year for that so that you can find out how much percentage of the car potential is there. We must work hard to improve everything, the engine and chassis, so that we can fight with the fastest cars. At the moment Chevrolet is faster than us in a few ways, but for some of the tracks we've been close and others not so close. For the rest of the championship we need to follow what we've done so far, in some races we've been able to fight for wins and podiums and other's we haven't. I expect to be competitive in Sonoma, Suzuka and Macau.
Has the Honda Civic met expectations?
Yes. The car was immediately very good, after a few laps on the first run in testing, I was positive about the potential of the car because it gave me good feedback - the engine driveability was also very good. We just need to improve on the faster tracks because on top speed, we are not very fast and also, we must improve the balance in the fast corners. At the moment we are competitive on slower corners and medium-pace circuits.
Are Yvan Muller and Chevrolet beatable?
For the championship, no. They have a really big gap; I haven't really scored big points in the last three meetings, due to accidents, bad luck and small mechanical problems. This has cost me a big gap in terms of points, which I won't be able to recover. I can fight for the top three in the championship and if I can achieve this, it will be a fantastic result.
How is the development going for next year's all new regulation car?
I haven't seen the car, to be honest with you. I know that JAS Motorsport is working on the car and Honda Japan are developing the new engine, it is too soon to say what will happen, as the project has been started with a clean sheet of white paper. We can only discover the car's real potential at the start of next year in the first race.
Do you agree with the new regulations?
Yes, I do. I think that now is also a good time to change. The current regulations are getting a bit old and we need a bit more power! The looks of the race cars will be close to the road car which is good, because people recognise the kind of car you are driving and they can relate to it, so there will be more appeal from the cars. So the next generation cars will be 'sexy!'
Apart from being 'sexy' what do you expect from the new cars?
Click on relevant pic to enlarge
the conversation - Add your comment
Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.